From Rick Ballard, Swift Package Manager release manager, a status update with regard to Swift 4. Here’s an overview of the proposals that have recently been incorporated into the system:
We’ve implemented a number of evolution proposal[s] this Spring:
• SE-0152 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0152-package-manager-tools-version.md ] introduced a “tools version”, stored in a comment at the top of the Package.swift manifest, which allows you to declare what version of the Swift tools your package requires, and to avoid resolving package dependencies against package versions which require newer tools than those you are using. The tools version is also used to control whether to enable new features such as the revised package manifest API, and to determine which Swift language version is used to interpret the manifest.
• SE-0158 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0158-package-manager-manifest-api-redesign.md ] redesigned the Package manifest API, adopting the Swift API design guidelines and cleaning up some problems in our API. Existing packages can continue to use the old Package manifest API until they update their Swift tools version.
• SE-0151 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0151-package-manager-swift-language-compatibility-version.md ] introduced a property to control which Swift language version should be used to compile a package’s sources. If this property is not set, the default is determined by the package’s Swift tools version.
• SE-0146 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0146-package-manager-product-definitions.md ] added explicit control over what products a package vends to clients, and what targets are used to build each product. Packages using the new manifest API must declare any products which they wish their package to vend.
• SE-0175 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0175-package-manager-revised-dependency-resolution.md ] removed the conditional “pinning” feature and replaced it with a simpler “resolved package versions” file (“Package.resolved”), along with improvements to SwiftPM’s dependency resolution behaviors.
• SE-0150 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0150-package-manager-branch-support.md ] added support for packages which depend on a branch, rather than a tagged version, of other packages. This is especially useful during bringup of a new package, and in-between tagged releases. In order to enforce stability for tagged versions, a tagged package version must only depend on other packages’ tagged versions, not on branches.
• SE-0162 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0162-package-manager-custom-target-layouts.md ] added API for controlling where the source files for each target should be found. This allows SwiftPM to support source trees that don’t conform to the standard package layout conventions.
• SE-0149 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0149-package-manager-top-of-tree.md ] added support for a “–path” flag to `swift package edit`, allowing users to take full control over an edited dependency and share it between multiple top-level packages.
In addition to these proposals, we’ve made other significant improvements:
• On macOS, package manifest interpretation and the package build are now sandboxed, to help mitigate the effects of maliciously crafted manifests.
• Many error messages and diagnostics have been improved, including information about conflicts during dependency resolution.
• Xcode project generation has been improved, and now allows schemes to reference package targets across regenerations of the project.
• There have been a host of smaller improvements and bugfixes.
All these changes are available in the Xcode 9 beta released today, and in the Swift 4.0 Development snapshots available at https://swift.org/download/#snapshots.
Xcode 9 lays the groundwork for first-class, native support in Xcode for Swift packages with the preview version of its new build system. This build system provides the flexibility and extensibility needed to allow Xcode to support new build models, such as Swift packages. Additionally, considerable work has gone into the SwiftPM library vended by the SwiftPM project, which will support integrating Swift packages into tools like Xcode.
So what’s left in SwiftPM 4? First, we will be implementing SE-0179 [ https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0179-swift-run-command.md ], support for a `swift package run` command. Beyond that, we expect to start winding down this release and looking ahead to the next, though we are still open to suggestions or evolution proposals for modest features and fixes.
There are a few features that we originally considered for SwiftPM 4 which are unlikely to be included in this release at this point: performance test support, support for configuration files, support for repositories which contain more than one package, and build settings support. With the possible exception of configuration files, these are likely to be a high priority for the next release. In particular, the core team has done work on a design for build settings which we expect to invite comment and discussion on early in the next release; this is a fairly consequential feature, and we want to make sure to get it right. Since that feature is not landing in SwiftPM 4, we are considering adding some package properties in SwiftPM 4 that will help alleviate some of the biggest pain points here, such as a C++ language version property.
Other features we will likely consider for the next release cycle include support for package resources (such as image assets), license and metadata support, explicit support for handling source control forking, and a generic mechanism for invoking build tools that the package manager doesn’t natively support. Finally, we do anticipate supporting a centralized package index at some point in the future, and we may begin laying the groundwork for that in the upcoming year.
As always, we appreciate the support, feedback, contributions, and adoption we’ve gotten from the package manager community. We’re looking forward to working with you all over the upcoming year to make SwiftPM even better.
Comments are closed.