Feedback solicited. I think it’s ready to fly but any last minute sanity check details will be appreciated (more behind the fold…)
Establish consistent label behavior across all parameters including first labels
- Proposal: SE-0046
- Author(s): Jake Carter, Erica Sadun
- Status: Awaiting review
- Review manager: Chris Lattner
We propose to normalize the first parameter declaration in methods and functions. In this proposal, first parameter declarations will match the existing behavior of the second and later parameters. All parameters, regardless of position, will behave uniformly. This will create a simple, consistent approach to parameter declaration throughout the Swift programming language and bring method and function declarations in-sync with initializers, which already use this standard.
Discussion took place on the Swift Evolution mailing list in the Make the first parameter in a function declaration follow the same rules as the others thread.
In the current state of the art, Swift 2 methods and functions combine local and external names to label parameters. These differentiated symbols distinguish names for internal implementation and external consumption. By default, a Swift 2 parameter declaration that appears first in the parameter list omits its external name. Second and later parameters duplicate local names as external labels. Under these Swift 2 rules, a declaration that looks like this:
func foo(a: T, b: U, c: V)
foo(_:b:c:) and not
Historically, this label behavior was normalized in Swift 2, unifying parameter naming rules for methods and functions, which had previously used separate defaults behaviors. The new unified approach approximated Objective-C naming conventions where first parameter labels were subsumed into the first part of a method signature. For the most part, Swift 2 developers were encouraged to mimic this approach and build calls that moved the label name out of the parameter list and into the function or method name.
Swift 3’s newly accepted API naming guidelines shook up this approach. They more thoroughly embraced method and function first argument labels. The updated naming guidance is further supported by the automated Objective-C API translation rules recently accepted for Swift 3. Under these revised guidelines, first argument labels are encouraged for but are not limited to:
- methods and functions where the first parameter of a method is defaulted
- methods and functions where the first argument uses a prepositional phrase
- methods and functions that implement factory methods
- methods and functions where method arguments represent a split form of a single abstraction
First argument labels are also the standard for initializers.
This expanded guidance creates a greater reach of first argument label usage and weakens justification for a first-parameter exception. Ensuring that parameter declarations behave uniformly supports Swift’s goals of clarity and consistency. This change produces the simplest and most predictable usage, simplifying naming tasks, reducing confusion, and easing transition to the language.
Under this proposal, first parameters names automatically create matching external labels, mimicking the second and later parameters. For example
func foo(x: Int, y: Int)
foo(x:y:) and not
foo(_:,y:). Developers will no longer need to double the first label to expose it to consuming API calls.
The existing external label overrides will continue to apply to first parameters. You establish external parameter names before the local parameter name it supports, separated by a space. For example,
func foo(xx x: Int, yy y: Int)
func foo(_ x: Int, y: Int)
This proposal will impact existing code, requiring migration support from Xcode. We propose the following solution:
- Function declarations that do not include explicit first item external labels (for example,
func foo(x: Int, y: Int)) will will explicitly remove the first argument’s label by adding the underscore token and translate to
func foo(_ x: Int, y: Int).
- Function call sites (e.g.
foo(2, y: 3)) will remain unaffected.
- Selector mentions (e.g.
#selector(ViewController.foo(_:y:))) will remain unaffected
We do not recommend swapping the fixit behavior. Functions are more often called and mentioned than declared. Under a swap, the call site would update to
foo(x:2, y:3), selector mentions would update to
#selector(ViewController.foo(x:y:) and the declaration left as is, to be interpreted as an explicitly named first label.
Ideally the migrator will locate patterns where the last letters of a function name match the first parameter name, for example
tintWithColor(color: UIColor), and insert a
FIXME: warning suggesting manual migration. Swift’s automatic Objective-C import code might be repurposed to detect a prepositional phrase and parameter match to automate a fixit for
tint(color: UIColor) or
tint(withColor: UIColor) but this would involve a more complicated implementation.
This proposal does not affect the behavior of Swift subscripts in any way. Subscripts act as an indexing shortcut for accessing the member elements of a type. Although subscripts can use optional labels, there is no parallel between their use of labels and the function and method parameters discussed in this proposal. You remain free to implement subscripts in the most appropriate way for your particular type’s functionality, with or without labels.
There are no alternatives considered at this time.